3/18/14

Predicting share price: Franklin Resources to grow


Here, we revise our pricing model for Franklin Resources (NYSE: BEN) presented on March 18, 2012.  According to Yahoo.comThe firm provides its services to individuals, institutions, pension plans, trusts, and partnerships. It manages, through its subsidiary, separate client-focused equity, fixed income, and balanced portfolios.” BEN is a financial company and we analyzed it three years ago as a candidate for bankruptcy.  

We presume that any share price can be represented as a weighted sum of two consumer price indices (not seasonally adjusted in our model) which may be leading the share price by several months. Our model also includes a linear time trend and an intercept in order to remove mean and trend components from all involved time series.  The intuition behind our pricing model is obvious – we link a given share to those goods and services which are produced/provided by the company. In order to provide a dynamic reference we also introduce in the model some relative and independent level of prices (also expressed by CPIs). Hence, one needs two different CPIs to define the model. These CPIs we select from a big set of 92 CPIs by minimizing the residual model error. 
 
In March 2012, the tentative model was driven by the consumer price index of food at home, FH, leading the price by five months and the index of other goods and services, O, which led by nine months. In the 2012 revised model, the former index is replaced by the index of food without beverages, FB, which leads the share price by four months. Both indices are shown in Figure. The tentative and revised pricing models are as follows:

BEN(t) = -5.47FH(t-5) – 1.81O(t-9) – 59.55(t-2000) + 1327.36, February 2012  
BEN(t) = -7.33FB(t-4) – 1.52O(t-9) – 69.58(t-2000) + 1536.22, October 2012  
BEN(t) = -2.39FB(t-4) – 0.50O(t-9) + 22.75(t-2000) + 504.08, March 2014    

where t is calendar time.  The standard error between July 2003 and March 2014 is $2.50 ($7.55 in March 2012). Figure 3 shows the model residual.   

Figure 2 depicts the observed and predicted monthly closing prices since 2003 and also provides the high/low monthly prices, which may serve as the estimates of uncertainty in the monthly price. (One can model the monthly high or low price instead of the closing one.) At a four month horizon, the price is expected to grow to the final level of $60.


Figure 1. The evolution of defining CPIs.

Figure 2. Observed and predicted BEN share prices together with the high/low monthly prices.


Figure 3 . The standard model error.

Modeling share price: Aflac Incorporated

Here we revisit our stock price model for Aflac Incorporated (AFL). This model was first estimated in March 2011 and has been several times re-estimated with new data (last November 2012). Currently, we have the closing monthly price for March 2014 and the consumer price indices for February 2014. We decompose a share price into a weighted sum of two consumer price indices. This allows linking any share price with relative pricing power of goods and services associated with the company. Accordingly, our goal is to test the original model and to update time lags and coefficients. Overall, the model has demonstrated an excellent predictive power and stability over the whole period since 2011. It can predict at a one-month horizon and the current prediction foresees no significant changes in the AFL price in 2014.  

As in all previous models, the AFL share price is defined by the consumer price index of household furnishing and operations (HFO) and that transportation services (TS); both presented in Figure 1. In February 2012, the defining time lags were as follows: the HFO index led the share price by 1 month and the TS by 6 months, but in the current model the first lag is one month. All relevant best-fit models for AFL(t) are as follows:  

AFL(t) =  -5.02HFO(t-2) – 2.87TS(t-6)  + 20.42(t-1990) + 997.71,  March 2011

AFL(t) =  -4.63HFO(t-0) – 2.90TS(t-5)  + 20.41(t-1990) + 953.49, September 2011

AFL(t) =  -4.63HFO(t-1) – 2.87TS(t-6)  + 20.23(t-1990) + 948.72, December 2011

AFL(t) =  -4.65HFO(t-1) – 2.86TS(t-6)  + 20.20(t-1990) + 949.35, February 2012

AFL(t) =  -4.43HFO(t-2) – 2.71TS(t-6)  + 19.10(t-2000) + 1094.64, September 2012

AFL(t) =  -4.91HFO(t-1) – 2.59TS(t-6)  + 18.81(t-2000) + 1131.05, March 2014

 

where AFL(t) is the AFL share price in U.S. dollars,  t is calendar time.  

Figure 2 depicts the high and low monthly prices for an AFL share together with the predicted and measured monthly closing prices (adjusted for dividends and splits). The model residual error ($4.38 for the period between July 2003 and March 2014) is depicted in Figure 3.


Figure 1. Defining indices. 


Figure 2. Observed and predicted AFL share prices. 


Figure 3. The model residual error $4.38.

Drang nach Osten — «натиск на Восток»

ИИ гугла написал « Drang nach Osten — «натиск на Восток») — это исторический термин, обозначающий германскую экспансию на славянские и восто...