3/19/13

Time to sell the S&P 500


In the middle of December 2012, we reported on the evolution of S&P 500 and decided to sell the index at 1430, which we had bought at 1352 in November. Due to technical reasons not related to our investing decisions we were able to sell the whole lot only on December 15 at 1420. The return from November is 4.7%; and from May 2012, when we first formulated this tactics, we made around 15%. We also decided to buy the S&P 500 at ~1400 whenever it comes. This level was touched on December 28.  Then we predicted a rally to 1550 according to our simple and straightforward investing tactics – we follow the trajectory of the S&P 500 observed during the rally between 2002 and 2007. In March 2013, the S&P 500 exceeded 1560 and currently stays to fall to 1450 in a month. If to follow up our procedure, as explained in Figures 1 through 6, it’s time to sell and wait for a new short-term rally in June-October 2013.  Then a tremendous fall down to 750 in 2015 is not excluded. Since 2009, the S&P 500 has been exactly following the previous trajectory. Why should it stay high after October 2013? Currently, I am in 10-year bonds and look for 1.5% to 1.7% yield to sell them in June.

In March 2012, we first published a graph which showed that the S&P 500 index would have a local fall in May 2012 at the level 1300.  In a few sessions, we bought S&P 500 index in May/June 2012 at the level 1287 to 1322.  The initial idea was to sell by the end of 2013 at 1525 and get a 12% to 14% return. In September, the S&P was at 1450, which was far above the expected level, and we decided to sell and wait a negative correction to 1350 to 1375 to re-enter the index. Selling at ~1460, we obtained an approximately 10% return in September.  In October, the S&P 500 fell to 1350 as had been predicted in September and we re-entered in two sessions at 1348 and 1355. By the end of November the S&P 500 regained 4.5% (1416). Two weeks ago, we expected the index to rise to 1430 to 1450 in December 2012. This was considered as the best time to sell before the next negative correction in December 2012/ January 2013. In reality, this correction to 1400 was very short.

Below we present the evolution of the S&P 500 and the step-by-step assumptions illustrating the decisions we have made since March 2012.

Figure 1 shows the evolution of the S&P 500 index since 1980. After 1995, the index behavior reveals some saw teeth with peaks in 2000 and 2007. The current growth resembles those between 1997 and 2000 and from 2003 and 2007.  There are two deep troughs in 2002 and 2009 which are marked by red and green lines.  For the current analysis we assume that the repeated shape of the teeth is likely induced by a degree of similarity in the evolution of macroeconomic variables. The intuition behind such an assumption is obvious – in the long run the stock market depends on the overall economic growth.

Having two peaks and troughs between 1995 and 2009, what can we say about the current growth in the S&P 500? Before making any statistical estimates, in Figure 2 we have shifted forward the original curve in Figure 1 in order to match the 2009 trough (blue line).  When the 2002 and 2009 troughs are matched, one can see that the current growth path closely repeats that after 2002. The first big deviation from the blues curve in Figure 2 started in 2011 and had amplitude of 150 units (from 1210 to 1360).  The black curve returned to the blue one in August/September 2011. From December 2011, we observed a middle-size deviation of about 100 units.

 Figure 1. The evolution of the S&P 500 market index between 1980 and 2012.

In April 2012, we predicted a drop in the S&P 500 to the level of 1300 by the end of May. Figure 2 shows the predicted behavior in April and May 2012, with the predicted segment shown by red line. We expected that the path observed in the previous rally would be repeated with the bottom points coinciding.  When this prediction realized, we invested at the average price 1320. In May 2012, the expected exit level was 1500 in October 2013.



Figure 2. The original S&P 500 curve (black line) and that shifted forward to match the 2009 trough (blue line). Red line – expected fall in the S&P 500: from 1400 in March to 1300 in May.

Figure 3 shows the evolution of the S&P 500 monthly closing price between May and August 2012. The S&P 500 closing level for August was 1430 and reached 1469 in the middle of September. This level provided a ten percent return over approximately 4 months. One can see that the observed level was far above the expected level (blue line). The return and the deviation from the expected level both made us think that this was the best time to exit. We sold the index on September 21 (1460) anticipating strong turbulence (economic, financial, and political) and an overall fall to 1375 at a few month horizon. 

 
Figure 3. Same as in Figure 2 with an extension between May and August.

Figure 4 shows the evolution of the S&P 500 monthly closing price in September-November 2012. The October’s closing level was 1411. On October 26, we put the November’s level down to 1375. One can see that the red line intersects the blue curve. The previous history of the black and red lines intersection with the blue one made us think that the time to enter the market (S&P 500 index) was approaching. We expected to buy at 1350 to 1375.  



Figure 4. Same as in Figure 2 with an extension between September and November 2012.  

Figure 5 depicts the state of the S&P 500 on December 15, 2012.  The index had a local minimum of 1347 in the middle of November and recovered to 1416 on November 30. This was 15 points less than the expected level of 1430 in December 2012. The red line intersects the blue one in January 2013 and a negative correction to 1400 (or less) was expected.



Figure 5. Same as in Figure 4 with an extension into December 2012.  

Figure 6 displays the current situation with the S&P 500. As in a few cases after 2010, the actual index (red line) leads the expected one (blue) by a month or so. It has reached the (closing) level 1563 on March 14 and has been falling since then. As in April and November 2012, we expect the index to fall. The level is likely around 1455. Then it might regain its power and have a final spurt to 1560 in October 2013. Do not miss this last opportunity.   



Figure 6. Same as in Figure 5 with an extension into March 2013.  

The quality of the Census Bureau's statistics is highly disappointing


Looking closer at the household income distribution reported by the Census Bureau I found an extremely confusing conflict of data on Gini ratio. There are two tables providing annual Gini ratio estimates for all households: “HINC-01. Selected Characteristics of Households, by Total Money” and “Table H-4.  Gini Ratios for Households, by Race and Hispanic Origin of Householder:  1967 to 2011”. The former estimates are available since 1998 in “Detailed Tables”. Figure 1 reveals a dramatic difference between these two estimates for the same years. The HINC-01 time series does not show any Gini ratio increase between 1998 and 2008 unlike the H-4 series.

There is a dramatic 0.02 step in 2009 in the HINC-01 series, which is actually fully related to the change in bin counting in 2009: the original $2500 bins between $0 and $100,000 were replaced by $5000 bins between $0 and $200,000. The change in the range and granularity of data resulted in the observed Gini ratio shift. Figure 2 displays the Lorenz curves for the years between 1994 and 2011 as obtained from the household income distributions in the relevant HINC-01 tables. The Gini ratio step of 0.02 is explained by the difference between the 2008 and 2009 Lorenz curves. Therefore, it is of artificial character  and the HINC-01 curve would be at the level of 0.45 between 2009 and 2011 if to retain the $2500 bins and $100,000 range.

We have recalculated the Gini ratio for all years between 1994 and 2011 from the original household income distribution and found that the calculated curve is in excellent agreement with the HINC-01 one between 2005 and 2011 and coincides with the HINC-4 curve from 1994 to 1996.

These observation are extremely confusing and likely manifest internal changes in the CB procedures of Gini ratio estimation and publication. We cannot understand why formally identical time series differ so much and why the HINC-4 curve demonstrates a growth tendency while the underlying data do not show any reason for that. This difference has also many political implications since the research community, officials, media, and the blogosphere all discuss the growth in household Gini, which is not the case.   
Figure 1. Gini ratios from HINC-01 (detailed)  and HINC-4 (historical) tables. 


Figure 2. The evolution of the Lorenz curves for the household income distribution between 1994 and 2011 in the USA. In 2009, the bin counting was changed from $2500 in the range to $100,000 to $5000 with the upper bin between $195,000 and $200,000.

2/27/13

Waveform cross correlation for seismic monitoring of underground nuclear explosions. Part I: Grand master events

A new paper is now available via arxiv.org:

Abstract

Seismic monitoring of the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty using waveform cross correlation requires a uniform coverage of the globe with master events well recorded at array stations of the International Monitoring System. The essence of cross correlation as a monitoring tool consists in a continuous comparison of digital waveforms at a given station with waveform templates from the global set of master events. At array stations, cross correlation demonstrates a higher resolution because the time delays at individual sensors from master and slave events are the same but they may differ from theoretical ones used in standard beamforming. In the regions where master events and thus waveform templates are available, one can reduce the amplitude threshold of signal detection by a factor of 2 to 3 relative to standard beamforming and STA/LTA detector used at the International Data Centre. The gain in sensitivity corresponds to a body wave magnitude reduction by 0.3 to 0.4 units and doubles the number of detected events. This gain is crucial for seismic monitoring under the CTBT. The coverage by real master events is sparse and confined to areas with historical seismicity, however. In two parts of this study, we investigate the possibility to populate the global grid with real and synthetic master events. In Part I, we replicate a high-quality master event over a regular grid several hundred kilometers from its actual position. In Part II, we model waveform templates using synthetic seismograms with the aim to apply them in aseismic zones. Both approaches are tested using the aftershock sequence of the April 11, 2012 Sumatera earthquake (Ms(IDC)=8.2). We used sixteen master events to recover the aftershocks in the Reviewed Event Bulletin of the IDC.

PDF copy of the paper

Re-post

starshinazapasa

Журнал Аркадия Бабченко


Previous EntryAdd to MemoriesShare Track ThisFlagNext Entry
Законопроект "Об оскорблении чувств младших научных сотрудников"
starshinazapasa
Как человек, верующий исключительно в науку, начал разрабатывать законопроект об оскорблении чувств доцентов, лаборантов и прочих ученых мужей. Стану депутатом - внесу в Думу.

За оскорбление "научных чувств ученых" - от трех до пяти. Формулировка специально будет максимально расплывчатой и неконкретной, чтобы можно было посадить любого. Ляпнул, что дважды два пять - и на двушечку без скощухи. Будьте любезны, присядьте пожалуйста.
За танцы и пение на кафедре (особенно в балаклавах) - два года.
Книги, тетради, учебники, карандаши, ай-пады и пр. и пр. можно будет покупать только в университетской лавке. Учебные пособия, купленные вне университетской лавки, будут считаться антинаучными и знания не принесут.
Российская Академия Наук получит право беспошлинной торговли водкой и сигаретами.
В школах и детских садах будет введено изучение теории Большого Взрыва.
Президент Академии Наук будет ездить на двух "Кадиллаках", которые загоняют в специальный железнодорожный вагон. Охранять его будут сотрудники ФСО. Один, специально приставленный, перед посадкой в автомобиль будет складывать знак Интеграла у него на профессорской шапочке.
Президент Академии Наук будет ездить с мигалкой.


В каждой деревне будет построено по академии или как минимум университету шаговой доступности. Детские сады, библиотеки, общественная собственность - будут отчуждены в их пользу. Жители Валаама будут выселены повторно. Так, чисто за компанию.
Раз в год, в день Большого Взрыва, все вещество, над которым любой лаборант или МНС прочитает теорему Ферма - становится антивеществом. Из-за чего приобретает лечебные свойства, а также не будет тухнуть на протяжении всего остального года.
Здание Академии Наук будет находиться на балансе города. Но внутреннее пространство будет принадлежать Московской Профессуре. Автомойка, банкетные залы, торговые точки - также будут принадлежать Московской Профессуре и не будут облагаться налогом. Потому как будут производить не торговлю, а дарение в обмен на дензнаки по строго установленной таксе.
Засорение нанопылью старых научных фолиантов карается штрафом в 20 млн. рублей.
Появление Президента Академии Наук на публике без часов "Брегетт" не допускается.
В армии будет введен институт Военных Научных Сотрудников. В каждой части будет построено по университету.
Оскорбление в блогах Президента Академии Наук будет преследоваться по закону. ФСБ будет предложено "более дерзко" расследовать такие преступления.
Мы уйдем от вульгарного примитивного понимания креационизма.
Ученых тыкать в каждую телепередачу по поводу и без повода.
За отрицание теории Дарвина будет введена уголовная ответственность.
При попадании даже самых младших научных сотрудников все видеозаписи ДТП мгновенно аннигилируются.
На Московскую же Профессуру с мигалками действие ПДД, а также административного и уголовного кодексов - не распространяется.
Если какой-нибудь председатель ОЗПП Михаил Аншаков вздумает задаться вопросом, почему наше дарение в обмен на строго фиксированную таксу в Храме Науки не является торговлей, а также почему автомойки и прибыль - наша, а ремонт и поддержание здания - на балансе города, бить его по башке монтировкой нещадно, обвинять в клевете и заводить уголовные дела

2/21/13

Re-published from oilprice.com

The End Game for Oil & Gas Juniors: Interview with Chris Cooper

By James Stafford | Wed, 13 February 2013 23:19 | 0
The oil and gas game can be a tricky one for junior companies, but if played right the pay-off can be massive. At a time when juniors are risking a lot in volatile venues in the Middle East and Africa, Canada’s Aroway Energy (ARW) is planting its feet firmly in homeland soil and in conventional plays.
Why? Because for the smaller juniors this is not a long-term game and blowing all your capital to drill a single unconventional well in a risky frontier won’t pay off. Canada still has plenty to offer for juniors, even though you have to kiss plenty of frogs to find the prince. The end game, after all, is merger and acquisition.
In an exclusive interview with Oilprice.com, Aroway CEO Chris Cooper discusses:
• How to make or break a junior oil and gas company
• Why rail is becoming more attractive than pipeline transit
• Why most juniors won’t make it big in risky frontiers
• Why Keystone XL will get the green light
• Why oil and gas prices will increase
• Why the smaller juniors will stick to the conventional plays
• How the asset market is heating up … and what is ideal
• Why having control of infrastructure is key to success
• Where Canada’s oil and gas industry will be in a decade
• What every junior’s goal should be
Interview by James Stafford of Oilprice.com
James Stafford: Junior oil companies have been storming the scene with some bold investments in tricky frontier areas. Where do you see this going and what will the next phase for the juniors be? Where will the action be, in conventional or unconventional plays?
Chris Cooper: I am a big believer in the conventional plays. I find that the non-conventional plays are turning into more of a game for the intermediate-size companies primarily as a result of the capital that is required to exploit the resources. Horizontal wells with multi-stage fracturing is an expensive game. I find that the conventional plays expose juniors to a less risky scenario with higher returns on investment and longer-term production more often than not.
Given the current state of the capital markets and the scarcity of funding, I think the smaller juniors will continue to play in the conventional arena.
James Stafford: What’s the ideal partner for a junior company, and what can make or break it for a junior?
Chris Cooper: As far as make or breaking a junior, I believe you need to minimize the company’s risk by drilling wells that are going to give you good internal rates of return and steady production; a good mix of development and exploration wells. It is also very good to have a good operator that is responsible in keeping a control on costs.
James Stafford: What separates the good management teams from the mediocre in the Canadian junior oilpatch?
Chris Cooper: Management teams that have built and sold companies in the past have a responsible, methodical approach to how they run their businesses. More often than not, these teams do not try to re-invent themselves by drilling wells and formations that they have not done in the past. They continue to focus on what they know best, whether it be drilling in the Peace River Arch, chasing Leduc wells, or focusing on cardium wells. They often do not stray from their formulas and that is why they are good teams.
James Stafford: More Canadian oil is now being marketed by rail. Can you put the rail versus pipeline transport comparisons into perspective for us from a Canadian operating perspective?
Chris Cooper: A lot of companies, including Aroway, are capitalizing on the benefits of moving their oil via rail as opposed to pipeline. I think it will increase our netback, our profit per barrel, by several dollars immediately.
For instance, before we purchased our West Hazel Property in Skaskatchewan, the owners would truck to Talisman or another big operator that was pipeline-connected. Then, once the oil got to the pipeline-connected operator, they had to pay a certain amount of money to get it in the pipeline for diluents to meet pipeline specifications. Then they had to pay for the pipeline tariff and then they got the price the pipeline operator provided wherever they were on the pipeline.
So for example, the last month we got $53 to $54 a barrel, after the blend-in tariff for our West Hazel production, which is probably the lowest you’re going to see for a long time. Our netback on that oil was still greater than $20 a barrel. But for that $53.32 a barrel we sold, if transported by rail, we remove the pipeline tariff, we remove the blend for the diluents and we get $9 more added to the netback value.
So what we’ll end up doing is trucking our oil from the field to a company called Altex Energy, which is partly owned by Shell Canada. Shell owns all the railway cars and all these railway cars get filled up with heavy crude and shipped down to their Port Arthur facility on the Gulf Coast. At Port Arthur what typically happens to our crude--because it’s somewhere between 11 and 13 degree oil—is it goes straight into bunker fuel for ships.
So the refinery doesn’t have to touch it in some cases and that’s where we get a pretty substantial bump. Then you’re not subject to pipeline apportion and issues. It just opens up whole new markets for you.

At the end of the day we will get somewhere around $66 or $63 a barrel this month and then we’re going to bump that up by another $9 next month by taking all the crude we have in West Hazel by rail. So our netback will be $35 to $40--and that’s just the West Hazel crude.
James Stafford: What is the market like for assets right now, from a junior’s perspective? What’s the ideal prospect?
Chris Cooper: Asset sales are heating up. We are finding that there are a lot of assets being marketed through companies like Sayer and NRG Divestments. There are also several larger brokerage firms representing companies for “strategic alternatives.”
As an example, Aroway just picked up a great producing asset in Saskatchewan for $10,000/flowing barrel. The market for similar assets in Saskatchewan at that time was about $40,000/flowing barrel. Companies need to exercise patience and do their due diligence. Not to mention kissing a lot of frogs to find these types of assets. They are out there.

James Stafford: A lot of North American juniors are hitting the riskier frontiers with all they’ve got these days—from Iraqi Kurdistan to Sudan, even Somalia. Why are they willing to take this risk and is it paying off?
Chris Cooper: With higher risk comes higher reward, but I don’t think it is paying off in the broader sense. Sure, there are 2 or 3 juniors that have hit home runs, but more often than not a junior is going into those types of plays with only $5 or $10 million in the treasury and they blow this after drilling just one well. I have always believed there is great opportunity offshore, but the risks are lower and infrastructure and political stability in North America is in place. There is plenty of opportunity in North America.
James Stafford: Related to this, where do you see Canada’s oil and gas industry 10 years from now?
Chris Cooper: I see the oil and gas industry in Canada continuing to grow with the advancement of new drilling techniques and new innovations in exploiting existing pools to increase the recoverability. We have a stable political system in place which enables business opportunity to grow in Canada.
James Stafford: We hear a lot about Alberta, but what kind opportunities are we looking at in Saskatchewan?
Chris Cooper: Saskatchewan is definitely open for business. The royalties paid in Saskatchewan are very low and the production opportunities are very good. We are actively looking for new opportunities in Saskatchewan.

James Stafford: Do you lend any significance to Canadian media reports that the Cabinet is reviewing some new legislation that would set stiff payouts for the oil industry for accidents?
Chris Cooper: Personally, I think it is part of the grand plan to help the approval process. My theory is that the Canadian government will lay out a plan for big fines and then push to have the pipelines approved. The construction of pipeline projects creates jobs and would be good for the economy.
James Stafford: Do you think this is simply a carrot for the protesters at a time when the Enbridge hearings are raising tensions?
Chris Cooper: There will always be protesters.
James Stafford: What do you see happening to energy markets in 2013?
Chris Cooper: I see the price of oil and gas both increasing. They are depleting resources….it’s an inevitable function of supply and demand.
James Stafford: What are your views on the Keystone XL Pipeline? Do you think it is likely that Obama will approve its construction, and if so how will this affect your business?
Chris Cooper: I think he will approve it. The Governor of Nebraska gave the new route the okay. I think now that Obama has been re-elected he will go ahead and approve. Again, that is a lot of job-creation for an economy that is struggling. More pipelines are good for Canadian producers as it helps get our oil to market.
James Stafford: What are Aroway’s top three plays, and why?
Aroway plays
Chris Cooper: Our current plays all have different risk and production profiles. We have a large inventory and land spread in our JV lands in the Peace River Arch, which provide a healthy mix of development and exploration risk. Very big upside in this play.
Our West hazel production play is a very stable, long-term production scenario that we feel will provide great cash flow and netbacks to the company. For little investment we feel we can substantially increase production at West Hazel.
Aroway Primary Plays
Our Kirkpatrick Lake and Little bow lands in central Alberta are also very prospective properties that have the ability to turn into new core areas for the company. All our properties are oil focused and are highly prospective.
James Stafford: What can we expect from Aroway in 2013?
Chris Cooper: I am confident 2013 will be a big growth year for Aroway. We will continue to drill on our existing properties and leverage our production and financial position to take advantage of existing and upcoming opportunities in the sector as far as acquisitions and potential farm-in opportunities. We are confident it will be a big year for our shareholders.
James Stafford: 2013 has been touted as the year of the merger and acquisition. As one of the hottest investments around at the moment, do you think that Canadian junior oil & gas companies, like yourselves, will become a favoured target for larger oil companies looking to expand?
Chris Cooper: I think I can speak for most junior companies when I say, ‘I hope so’. There are a lot of big companies that need to fill the production gaps in their natural depletion, thus in some cases forcing big companies to do that through acquisition. I think the goal for most juniors is to be taken over by a bigger company at a nice premium for the shareholders.
James Stafford: Thanks for your time Chris. For those of you interested in finding out more about Aroway please visit their website at: http://www.arowayenergy.com/

Drang nach Osten — «натиск на Восток»

ИИ гугла написал « Drang nach Osten — «натиск на Восток») — это исторический термин, обозначающий германскую экспансию на славянские и восто...