Two years ago we published a post “The era of low energy
prices”. This era has come. Here we just repeat the post with updated
figures, which include now the data since 2012.
The long-term evolution of energy prices affects the
fundamental environment for stock prices. When consumer prices for various
goods and services have different but sustainable trends relative to energy
prices an opportunity arises for sound investments. Our observations show that
some of these sustainable trends have clear turning points which provide
investors with invaluable information on buy/sell decision. In this article, we
investigate the past and future evolution of the consumer price index (CPI) of energy
and demonstrate that it may fall sharply in the near future.
Six years ago we published a paper on the presence of long-term sustainable trends in the differences between various components
of the CPI in the USA. We started with the difference between the core CPI
(i.e., the CPI less food and energy) and the overall CPI. Then the consumer price index of energy,
which gives approximately 9% of the headline CPI, was analyzed. In the beginning
of 2008, we tentatively identified a turning point in the difference between
the CPI and the energy index and predicted energy prices to fall relative to
the core CPI through the first half of the 2010s. Here we revisit this
prediction and demonstrate the turning point timing and the duration was
relatively accurate.
Here we study the relative evolution of the core
consumer price index (CPI) and the CPI of energy. Figure 1 displays the
difference between the core CPI and the index for energy for the period between
1960 and November 2014. All CPIs are seasonally adjusted and borrowed from the BLS.
Before 1980, these two indices had been growing almost in sync with
fluctuation around 10 units of price index. Between 1981 and 1999, the
difference grew from -10 to almost 80 units. Between 2001 and 2008, a period of
intensive growth in the energy index was observed. Qualitatively, one can
distinguish three periods of linear trend and three turning periods with a higher
volatility. The last turning point was in 2008 and the index of energy is
likely on a declining path relative to the core CPI. However, the extremely high volatility masks
the new trend in the difference.
The past few months have revealed a new statistically
significant trend – the difference started to grow at a higher rate. This is a
clear manifestation of the new, low-energy-cost, era.
Figure 1. The difference between the core CPI and the
index for energy between 1960 and 2014. There are three periods of linear trend
and three turning periods. The most recent turning point was in 2008.
Figure 2 provides a detailed view of the
most recent period. The energy index grew much faster than the core CPI between
2001 and 2008. Linear regression gives a slope of -14 for the difference curve.
This assumes that the energy index grew by 14 units faster every year than the
core CPI. Since August 2005, the energy
price volatility has been at an elevated level and one can likely classify the past
seven years as a period of bifurcation. In 2012, there was no clear indication
of the direction and slope of the next linear trend. At the same time, we did
not expect any further increase in oil price beyond that dictated by the overall
price increase. We also expected the current volatility period is close to its
natural end and the difference of the core and energy CPI will be growing along
the new trend shown by green line in Figure 2.
Now we see the price of oil falling and driving the
price of energy in the CPI down. The difference of the CPI and energy index has
been rising since July-August and the difference is currently above the green
(trend) line. The question is how long will last the period of cheaper energy and
how low will be the price fall.
Figure 2. Same as in Figure 1, for the
period after 2002. Linear trends are shown.
We used only absolute difference so far. It is
instructive to analyze the difference in relative terms and we have normalized
the difference to the core CPI. Figure 3 illustrates the new pattern. In
contrast to Figure 1, the amplitudes and periods of long term fluctuations are
similar and the overall evolution seems to be repeatable. Figure 4 exercises
the assumption of repeatability. We have shifted the original curve by 27 years
ahead and obtained a striking similarity in the amplitude and timing of the energy
price falls and rises. Figure 5 shows a detailed picture.
From the red curve, we expected in 2012 an energy cliff, as it had been
observed 27 years ago. We expected the era of low energy prices to come.
If the history repeats itself we will observe very low
energy prices, the price index of energy will drop by 50 points from the November
2014 level or by ~20%, in a year or less. This era will last several years, at
least.
Figure 3. The difference between the core and energy
CPIs normalized to the core CPI.
Figure 4. Same as
in Figure 3 with red curve representing the original (black) curve shifted 27
years ahead.
Figure 5. The energy
cliff has come and energy price experience free fall?
No comments:
Post a Comment