Five years ago we published two
papers [1,
2],
which introduced a new macroeconomic model explaining the evolution of labour
productivity in developed countries. This model is parsimonious and uses only
one measured macroeconomic variable as the driving force of the productivity
growth – real GDP per capita. Figure 1 is borrowed from our monograph “mecћanomics.
Economics as Classical Mechanics” (Figure 3.22) and illustrates the
predictive power of the model as applied to Canada. (Due to high volatility of
productivity measurements, the measured data set is represented by its 5-year
moving average, MA(5)). All coefficients in the model for Canada were obtained
empirically, as explained in the papers.
Considering the model simplicity and
the accuracy of data on real GDP and productivity, the prediction of the time
history in Canada is excellent. (We would be grateful if the reader could provide
us with a reference to a model which gives better predictions.) It is also
important that the prediction covers the whole period since 1960 with one
deterministic link without any structural breaks.
Practically all
mainstream macroeconomic models (e.g.
DSGE)
are using the notion of shocks to productivity as the key phenomenon explaining
all bigger deviations in the rate of real economic growth. This implies that
productivity must define real GDP. This assumption contradicts observations, as
our model demonstrates – the change in labour force productivity lags by two
(!) years behind the defining change in real GDP. Therefore, the labour productivity
is not a proactive macroeconomic variable.
Figure 1. Observed and predicted productivity in Canada: N(1959)=270000, A2=$300,
B=-3200000, C=0.108; R2=0.8. (Figure 3.22 in our monograph.)
The original data set was limited
to 2007. Six years later, one can test the predictive power of the model using
new data. As three
years ago, we use the data set published
by the Conference Board. Figure 2 shows that our prediction for 2008 through
2012 was accurate. In 2010, we expected a significant growth in labour
productivity in Canada. This growth has been actually observed since 2010 and
continues in 2013.
Conclusion:
The labour productivity in Canada is on a growing trend and will retain
the rate of ~1.0% per year in 2013-2016.
Figure 2. Same as in Figure 1 extended by five readings
between 2008 and 2012.
No comments:
Post a Comment