The Chinese ballon was likely a meteorological one with corresponding devices. If shot down above land, the debris would prove this assumption and it would be an aggressive act against a scientific device although lost its path. It was shot above water in order to be able to claim that the remnants were not found. There will be no proof that it was a spy device or a scientific one. Saves the face.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
And who gets all the money in the US?
The Federal Bank of St. Louis publishes various economic data. Some of them are very interesting not from the point of view of economics, bu...
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot... -
These days sanctions and retaliation is a hot topic. The first round is over and we will likely observe escalation well supported by po...
-
This paper "Gender income disparity in the USA: analysis and dynamic modelling" is also of interest Abstract We analyze and deve...
No comments:
Post a Comment