The Chinese ballon was likely a meteorological one with corresponding devices. If shot down above land, the debris would prove this assumption and it would be an aggressive act against a scientific device although lost its path. It was shot above water in order to be able to claim that the remnants were not found. There will be no proof that it was a spy device or a scientific one. Saves the face.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Трамп: лидер, системный человек или безумец?
Каждый человек, обладающий высшей государственной властью, должен разделять в уме три разных способности решать вопросы, относящиеся к долж...
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot...
-
Almost every day, I have a request to publish this paper " Race and gender income inequality in the USA: black women vs. white men...
No comments:
Post a Comment