The Chinese ballon was likely a meteorological one with corresponding devices. If shot down above land, the debris would prove this assumption and it would be an aggressive act against a scientific device although lost its path. It was shot above water in order to be able to claim that the remnants were not found. There will be no proof that it was a spy device or a scientific one. Saves the face.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why Musk in a win position against Trump
The whole MT feud is about interests. M has invested in promotion of own interest. T accepted this investment. It did not work from T side....
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot...
-
This paper "Gender income disparity in the USA: analysis and dynamic modelling" is also of interest Abstract We analyze and deve...
-
Almost every day, I have a request to publish this paper " Race and gender income inequality in the USA: black women vs. white men...
No comments:
Post a Comment