It is clear that the US position articulated by Ned means the right opposite. (A word said is a lie.) There is no reason for the US to respond except for the direct massive attack on the US territory. Any response to any other application of the A-bomb anywhere means total destruction of the whole US. Ned just reflects the fear of the US elites in the last effort to avoid total annihilation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Spatio-temporal evolution of low-magnitude seismicity before the May 24, 2013, Sea of Okhotsk earthquake recovered by waveform cross correlation. Is it an earthquake prediction case?
Abstract According to the International Data Centre (IDC), the Sea of Okhotsk earthquake occurred at 05:44:49.7 on May 24, 2013, had c...
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot... -
These days sanctions and retaliation is a hot topic. The first round is over and we will likely observe escalation well supported by po...
-
This paper "Gender income disparity in the USA: analysis and dynamic modelling" is also of interest Abstract We analyze and deve...
No comments:
Post a Comment