It is clear that the US position articulated by Ned means the right opposite. (A word said is a lie.) There is no reason for the US to respond except for the direct massive attack on the US territory. Any response to any other application of the A-bomb anywhere means total destruction of the whole US. Ned just reflects the fear of the US elites in the last effort to avoid total annihilation.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Prediction of the Kamchatka July 29, 2025, earthquake by the evolution of low-magnitude seismicity recovered using waveform cross-correlation at IMS seismic arrays (Part 2)
There are dozens of REB events in Figure 21 that are not matched in the XSEL. The reason behind this underperformance could be related to ...
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot... -
These days sanctions and retaliation is a hot topic. The first round is over and we will likely observe escalation well supported by po...
-
Yesterday I missed the absolute hero of deflation in the US – the consumer price index of information technology, hardware and software (see...
No comments:
Post a Comment