The Afghan government and army were absolutely rational as investors during the crisis. If a fall is inevitable, then you need to get out of the process as early as possible. How could one assume that the Afghan army would fight if its defeat was inevitable, as everyone predicted it? Even a fool will understand, but apparently not the American intelligence, that resistance to the Taliban will lead to an immediate and long-term increase in the risk of being killed or going to jail. The very assumption that the army, doomed to inevitable defeat, will fight in order to justify analysts that it will hold out until winter, borders on the madness of the puppeteer in relation to the puppet.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Prediction of the Kamchatka July 29, 2025, earthquake by the evolution of low-magnitude seismicity recovered using waveform cross-correlation at IMS seismic arrays (Part 2)
There are dozens of REB events in Figure 21 that are not matched in the XSEL. The reason behind this underperformance could be related to ...
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot... -
These days sanctions and retaliation is a hot topic. The first round is over and we will likely observe escalation well supported by po...
-
Yesterday I missed the absolute hero of deflation in the US – the consumer price index of information technology, hardware and software (see...
No comments:
Post a Comment