Since 2008, we have
been reporting that the evolution of various components of CPI and PPI in the
United States is not a random process but rather a predetermined one with
long-term sustainable trends [1, 2].
Using these trends, one can predict consumer and producer price indices for
various goods, services and commodities. For example, in [3, 4], we
presented the evolution many goods and services with varying weights in the CPI. There are more
goods, services, and commodities of interest for producers, consumers, and
investors. Here we revisit the index for copper
ores (the previous revision was
two years ago). This is an example showing that some commodity prices are not well
predictable.
Figure 1
displays the difference between PPI and the index for copper ores since 1988.
This difference has a remarkable history: no big change between 1988 and 2003,
and then a sudden surge in the copper index started. The peak was reached in
the middle of 2006. It survived before the second quarter of 2008. Then the copper
index dropped by almost 300 units back to the PPI level. In 2009, the PPI of
copper increased above 500. One may consider
these changes as associated with the rise-fall cycles in oil price, but there
is no one-to-one correspondence.
We have to
admit that there is no sustainable trend in the copper index and the future of
the copper ores index cannot be predicted in the long run. Currently, the
difference is somewhere in the middle between the previous trough and zero line.
Moreover, it has reached the level of the previous local peak in 2007 (see
Figure 2 for relative prices). Two years ago we predicted that the PPI of
copper might go any direction into 2014, but did not exclude further fall in
the PPI of copper relative to the overall PPI. Currently, there is no sign that
the PPI of copper is going to change its long-term decline.
On the other
hand, aluminium has changed the price evolution dramatically, as Figure 3
shows. We expected
the difference to follow the green line into 2016, but this commodity
suddenly changed its behavior and the price of aluminum started to grow in 2014.
Currently, the price of aluminum follows a linear trend, which is almost a
mirror reflection of the expected growth. Same may happen to copper, which is
not a well predictable commodity in the long run, but evolve along short linear
segments.
Figure
1. Evolution of the price index of copper ores relative to the PPI.
Figure
2. Evolution of the difference between the overall PPI and the price index of
copper ores normalized to the PPI.
Figure
3. Evolution of the difference between the overall PPI and the price index of aluminum
scrap normalized to the PPI.
No comments:
Post a Comment