Gavyn Davies criticises the Fed for wrong money policy targeting on unemployment rate, UER, instead of the rate of employment, E/P. He is right that the rate of unemployment does not express well the full capacity of the economy. However, the rate of employment is quite different from the UER. Two figures below do show that the UER has been varying around 5% to 7% since 1948. The Fed can claim that monetary policy is effective because UER is always back to 6%. How can they say that they control E/P if it really has a strong secular component. Gavyn puts the Fed in danger to be responsible for that they can not be responsible for. It will never happen if the Fed has a bit of sense. The rate of employment is out of control not only for the Federal Reserve but also for any authority.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Трамп не безумен. Трамп это квантовая частица, пребывающая сразу во всех состояниях.
Я бы сравнил Трампа с квантовой частицей пребывающей во всех состояниях разом. От я "все куплю", до я "все возьму". Нуж...
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot...
-
These days sanctions and retaliation is a hot topic. The first round is over and we will likely observe escalation well supported by po...
-
Almost every day, I have a request to publish this paper " Race and gender income inequality in the USA: black women vs. white men...
No comments:
Post a Comment