Gavyn Davies criticises the Fed for wrong money policy targeting on unemployment rate, UER, instead of the rate of employment, E/P. He is right that the rate of unemployment does not express well the full capacity of the economy. However, the rate of employment is quite different from the UER. Two figures below do show that the UER has been varying around 5% to 7% since 1948. The Fed can claim that monetary policy is effective because UER is always back to 6%. How can they say that they control E/P if it really has a strong secular component. Gavyn puts the Fed in danger to be responsible for that they can not be responsible for. It will never happen if the Fed has a bit of sense. The rate of employment is out of control not only for the Federal Reserve but also for any authority.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Trump has to know what NATO's O'Shea said in 1999 on bombing of civilian constructions in Serbia
When Jamie O'Shea was asked in 1999 why NATO bombs civilian targets, he answered directly that the military uses them and that M. could...
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot...
-
This paper "Gender income disparity in the USA: analysis and dynamic modelling" is also of interest Abstract We analyze and deve...
-
Almost every day, I have a request to publish this paper " Race and gender income inequality in the USA: black women vs. white men...
No comments:
Post a Comment