A simple
comparison of productivity evolution in advanced economies. Acemoglu, Robinson and Verdier published a paper on technological
progress or “inventiveness” of the U.S. This paper was not accepted well in the blogosphere.
Not repeating the argumentation against the paper I’d like to presents three
simple graphs. I propose to measure the technological
progress of a country by the growth rate of productivity. There are three
variables representing productivity: output per hour, Ph, output per worker,
Pw, and GDP per capita, G. The intuition is simple – rising productivity mostly
reflects the usage of most progressive technology and human capital (also kind
of technology). In order to compare various countries, I have normalized all
time series to their respective values in 1950. Therefore, the curves in Figure
1 show the relative growth. One can judge
that the growth in the U.S. was the lowest. Japan rules! France is very
productive. The UK is the closest to the U.S. (All data are borrowed from TED maintained
by the Conference Board.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Prediction of the Kamchatka July 29, 2025, earthquake by the evolution of low-magnitude seismicity recovered using waveform cross-correlation at IMS seismic arrays (Part 2)
There are dozens of REB events in Figure 21 that are not matched in the XSEL. The reason behind this underperformance could be related to ...
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot...
-
These days sanctions and retaliation is a hot topic. The first round is over and we will likely observe escalation well supported by po...
-
Yesterday I missed the absolute hero of deflation in the US – the consumer price index of information technology, hardware and software (see...



No comments:
Post a Comment