1/20/12

Why history is not economics: Tell Me the Difference Between My Lai and Hiroshima

A thoughtful essay by Brian Kaplan on EconLog: http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2012/01/tell_me_the_dif.html

History as a soft science allows many compeletely opposite views at the same time. This is a problem of belief and self-defence. If economics as a science is just general judgement or belief then it should be treated as history, i.e. a biased view of prejudiced people with own interests.
at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Trump is right to fire the BLS top manager

  Who follows the BLS releases and reviews knows very well that the published figures are prone to larger revisions. The data has to be revi...

  • Ukraine vs. Russia: economic view
    These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot...
  • A few steps down to destroy WTO
    These days sanctions and retaliation  is a hot topic. The first round is over and we will likely observe escalation well supported by po...
  • Gender income disparity in the USA
     This paper "Gender income disparity in the USA: analysis and dynamic modelling" is also of interest Abstract We analyze and deve...