Statistically, there is a relatively simple way to validate (or demonstrate falsification) the overall distribution. It is commonly used by census bureaus and statistical agencies. One takes a random and small subset from a studied distribution (statistics) and repeat survey (voting) under full control. If the re-estimated statistics is quite different from the previously obtained result one may express a doubt in the accuracy of the original survey (voting). The size of the re-estimated set should be defined by the originally observed statistics and specifically from the polling stations with most suspicious results.
12/14/11
How can we validate the statistics of the Russian elections?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Why Musk in a win position against Trump
The whole MT feud is about interests. M has invested in promotion of own interest. T accepted this investment. It did not work from T side....
-
These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot...
-
This paper "Gender income disparity in the USA: analysis and dynamic modelling" is also of interest Abstract We analyze and deve...
-
Almost every day, I have a request to publish this paper " Race and gender income inequality in the USA: black women vs. white men...
No comments:
Post a Comment