Harley-Davidson (HOG) is one of the best illustrations of our concept (see a brief description of the concept in Appendix) linking stock prices to CPI components. For HOG, the model is stable for many years. The first model was obtained in September 2009 and covered the period from October 2008. Here we revisit the HOG model using the monthly closing price for September 2001 and the CPI estimates published for August 2011.

For HOG, the defining indices are as follows: the index of rent of primary residence (RPR) and the index of owners' equivalent rent of residence (ORPR). Both CPI components are leading the share price. Figure 1 depicts the evolution of the indices which provide the best fit model, i.e. the lowermost RMS residual error, between July 2008 and September 2011. The models are as follows:

*HOG(t) = -13.82RPR(t-3) +12.77ORPR(t-4) +17.82(t-1990) – 163.94,*before September 2009

*HOG(t) = -11.30RPR(t-3) + 9.83ORPR(t-3) +17.53(t-1990) – 36.34,*July 2011

*HOG(t) = -11.27RPR(t-3) + 9.55ORPR(t-3) +19.35(t-1990) – 8.57,*September 2011 where

*HOG(t)*is the share price in US dollars,*t*is calendar time. The model is characterised by standard deviation of $4.33 for the period between July 2003 and September 2011.Two recent models are depicted in Figure 2. The predicted curves lead the observed ones by 3 months. We do not foresee any further fall in the stock price. Figure 3 displays the residual error.

Figure 1. Evolution of the price indices ORPR and RPR.

Figure 2. Observed and predicted POM share prices. Upper panel – the model for March 2011. Lower panel – the model for September 2011.

Figure 3. The model residual error.

**Appendix**

In its general form, our pricing model is as follows:

*sp(t*

_{j}) = Σb_{i}∙CPI_{i}(t_{j}-*t*

_{i}*) + c∙(t*(1)

_{j}-1990 ) + d + e_{j}where

*sp(t*is the share price at discrete (calendar) times_{j})*t*,_{j}*j*=1,…,*J*;*CPI*_{i}(t_{j}-*t*_{i}*)*is the*i*-th component of the CPI with the time lag*t**,*_{i}*i*=1,..,*I*;*b*,_{i}*c*and*d*are empirical coefficients of the linear and constant term;*e*is the residual error, which statistical properties have to be scrutinized. By definition, the bets-fit model minimizes the RMS residual error. The time lags are expected because of the delay between the change in one price (stock or goods and services) and the reaction of related prices. It is a fundamental feature of the model that the lags in (1) may be both negative and positive. In this study, we limit the largest lag to eleven months. Apparently, this is an artificial limitation and might be changed in a more elaborated model._{j}System (1) contains

*J*equations for*I+2*coefficients. For POM we use a time series from July 2003 to March 2011, i.e. 94 monthly readings. Due to the negative effects of a larger set of defining CPI components their number for all models is (*I=*) 2. To resolve the system, we use standard methods of matrix inversion. As a rule, solutions of (1) are stable with all coefficients far from zero. In the POM model, we use 92 CPI components. They are not seasonally adjusted indices and were retrieved from the database provided by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.Due to obvious reasons, longer time series guarantee a better resolution between defining CPIs. In general, there are two sources of uncertainty associated with the difference between observed and predicted prices. First, we have taken the monthly close prices (adjusted for splits and dividends) from a large number of recorded prices: monthly and daily open, close, high, and low prices, their combinations as well as averaged prices. Second source of uncertainty is related to all kinds of measurement errors and intrinsic stochastic properties of the CPI and its components. One should also bear in mind all uncertainties associated with the CPI definition based on a fixed basket of goods and services, which prices are tracked in few selected places. Such measurement errors are directly mapped into the model residual errors. Both uncertainties, as related to stocks and CPI, also fluctuate from month to month.

## No comments:

## Post a Comment