5/16/10

CXO and S&P 500 returns

I appreciate the reader's interest to our recent paper "S&P 500 returns revisited" , which resulted in the review made by CXO experts. I have no specific comments on the review except mainly qualitative charater of the assessment. The paper is chiefly quantitative, however.
In this sense, no words can justify our statements, only observations. A year ago, we predicted the fall in May 2010. See what will happen next, and lets revisit the CXO assessment in December 2010. If the model is wrong - everybody will see that it is wrong.
at
Labels: , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Now on arXiv.org: Spatio-temporal evolution of low-magnitude seismicity before the May 24, 2013, Sea of Okhotsk earthquake recovered by waveform cross correlation. Is it an earthquake prediction case?

 Now my paper  Spatio-temporal evolution of low-magnitude seismicity before the May 24,    2013, Sea of Okhotsk earthquake recovered by wave...

  • Ukraine vs. Russia: economic view
    These are two biggest parts of the Former Soviet Union. To characterize them from the economic point of view we borrow data from the Tot...
  • A few steps down to destroy WTO
    These days sanctions and retaliation  is a hot topic. The first round is over and we will likely observe escalation well supported by po...
  • Gender income disparity in the USA
     This paper "Gender income disparity in the USA: analysis and dynamic modelling" is also of interest Abstract We analyze and deve...